Art Jury Committee Meeting Minutes
RSF Association Office - 8:00 a.m.
April 21, 2008 cont.

Return to Art Jury

Previous Art Jury Minutes

Leonard Property I.D. 9.1.4
Preliminary Application: Pool House with Covered Areas (1,630 sq. ft.), Grading

The Art Jury APPROVED the Preliminary Application subject to the following conditions:

1. Colors and materials shall match the existing building.
2. Landscaping is required to screen the project from off-site. If for any reason the final, approved landscape installation does not meet this objective, the Association may require additional plantings, pursuant to Regulatory Code Section 42.0302. Any existing vegetation not shown and approved on the plans as “to be removed” shall be considered “Critical View” landscaping as defined in that regulation. Any trees or landscaping damaged or destroyed during construction or transplanting shall be replaced in-kind with new materials prior to Final Inspection of the landscaping.

Paxton Property I.D. 44.3.1
Workshop Application: Addition (1,486 sq. ft.), Attached Covered Areas (1,038 sq. ft.), Detached Storage Building (1,050 sq. ft.), Green House (240 sq. ft.), Pool/Spa           

The Art Jury made the following comments:

1. Please provide conceptual grading plans at a larger scale produced by a registered civil engineer showing the entry drive. Please explore a joint/shared drive to improve the aesthetics of this element.
2. The Art Jury considers that the massing of the building has a ranch style appearance however exterior materials and forms (such as the rock work and large timbers) are not consistent with a ranch style design type. The Art Jury is in favor of a ranch style design, but is not in favor aesthetically of the “rustic/mountain” style design proposed. Please modify the design to reflect a ranch style building.
3. The exterior appearance of the existing detached garage/guest house should be modified to match a ranch style design of the main house.
4. Submit another Workshop Application.

Rancho Cielo Property I.D.45.2.1
Holdings Corp. Preliminary Application: Residence/Garage (9,125 sq. ft.), Attached Covered Areas (736 sq. ft.), Basement/Tuck-under (1,060 sq. ft.), Guesthouse (850 sq. ft.), Veranda (140 sq. ft.), Grading

The Art Jury APPROVED the Preliminary Application subject to the following conditions:

1. Submit colors and materials.
2. Submit a landscape plan with the following revisions:
   1. Provide on a single sheet, a site plan that indicates proposed landscaping and hard-scaping. The current submittal has numerous sheets at a large scale with matchlines, which make a comprehensive review by the Art Jury difficult.
   2. Reduce the length of the hammerhead near the entry gate to 20 feet.
   3. Substantially increase the landscape screening trees and shrubs along the roadside planter areas.
   4. The Art Jury noted some mounding may approvable along the road side planter areas pending further review.

Roland Property I.D.J.2.3
Workshop Application: Gazebo (170 sq. ft.), Detached Garage (725 sq. ft.), Detached Studio (937 sq. ft.)

The Art Jury made the following comments:

1. Submit a Preliminary Application according to the RSF Association’s “New Submittal” schedule.
2. Please add some additional architectural interest to the “blank” facades of the garage and art studio.
3. Please clarify whether or not the current proposal includes a deck over the slope. The site plan shows a deck but there is no mention of it in the rest of the application.

Ryan Property I.D. 20.2.1
Workshop Application: First Floor Addition (470 sq. ft.), Tuck-under Addition (1,248 sq. ft.), Tuck-under Garage (705 sq. ft.)

The Art Jury made the following comments:

1. Revise the concept to substantially reduce the amount of paving.
1. Consider reorienting the garage doors to face north.
2. With future applications please submit a topographic plan prepared by a civil engineer or surveyor. The Art Jury can make no further comments without accurate topographic information.
3. Please submit all information on standard sized sheets (e.g. 24 “ x 36” rather than

8½ “ x 11”).

CONSENT 2 AGENDA ITEMS:

Fishman Property I.D. 9.6.3
Final Application: Replace pasture fence, Re-roof existing horse shed, Two Shade Structures (768 sq. ft.), Pasture

The Art Jury APPROVED the Final Application subject to the following conditions: 

1. Please submit a plan for staff review and approval stating that the pastures shall be irrigated and will be maintained with healthy grass at all times.
2. Landscaping is required to screen the project from off-site. If for any reason the final, approved landscape installation does not meet this objective, the Association may require additional plantings, pursuant to Regulatory Code Section 42.0302. Any existing vegetation not shown and approved on the plans as “to be removed” shall be considered “Critical View” landscaping as defined in that regulation. Any trees or landscaping damaged or destroyed during construction or transplanting shall be replaced in-kind with new materials prior to Final Inspection of the landscaping.

Gatlin III Property I.D. 31.5.6
Final Application: Addition (590 sq. ft.), Attached Covered Areas (700 sq. ft.)

The Art Jury APPROVED the Final Application subject to the following conditions:

1. All perimeter landscaping shall be retained and maintained at its current height at a minimum.
2. Landscaping is required to screen the project from off-site. If for any reason the final, approved landscape installation does not meet this objective, the Association may require additional plantings, pursuant to Regulatory Code Section 42.0302. Any existing vegetation not shown and approved on the plans as “to be removed” shall be considered “Critical View” landscaping as defined in that regulation. Any trees or landscaping damaged or destroyed during construction or transplanting shall be replaced in-kind with new materials prior to Final Inspection of the landscaping.

Las Casitas Property I.D. 30.1.5
Condo Association Final Application: Fencing, Landscape, Repaint

The Art Jury APPROVED the repaint subject to the following conditions:

1. Colors #1, #2 or #3 are approved from the color chart submitted on April 15, 2008.
2. The white trim color is approved from the color chart submitted on March 25, 2008.

 

The Art Jury APPROVED the fence subject to the following conditions:

1. The fence shall be painted to match the approved color of the building.
2. Old fencing shall be removed to create a uniform appearance.
3. Provide a landscaping plan for screening of the fence from off-site views.
4. Fence height shall not exceed five feet in height from the parking lot side.

Rancho Santa Fe Property I.D. 38.2.1
Osuna Ranch Final Application: Corral Fencing

The Art Jury APPROVED the Final Application subject to the following condition:

1. Landscaping is required to screen the project from off-site. If for any reason the final, approved landscape installation does not meet this objective, the Association may require additional plantings, pursuant to Regulatory Code Section 42.0302. Any existing vegetation not shown and approved on the plans as “to be removed” shall be considered “Critical View” landscaping as defined in that regulation. Any trees or landscaping damaged or destroyed during construction or transplanting shall be replaced in-kind with new materials prior to Final Inspection of the landscaping.

Wolf Property I.D. 33.8.1
Final Application: Fencing

The Art Jury APPROVED the Final Application subject to the following conditions:

1. Landscaping is required to screen the project from off-site. If for any reason the final, approved landscape installation does not meet this objective, the Association may require additional plantings, pursuant to Regulatory Code Section 42.0302. Any existing vegetation not shown and approved on the plans as “to be removed” shall be considered “Critical View” landscaping as defined in that regulation. Any trees or landscaping damaged or destroyed during construction or transplanting shall be replaced in-kind with new materials prior to Final Inspection of the landscaping.

ART JURY SITE VISITS:

The Art Jury made site visits from to the following locations:

Name	Address
Aasted	Zumaque
Lago Lindo Development	Lago Lindo